Sensory quality, colour and oxidative stability of cured cooked ham with propolis extract

  • Miroslav Kročko Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department for Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Marek Bobko Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department for Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Ondřej Bučko Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department for Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Margita Čanigová Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department for Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Viera Ducková Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department for Evaluation and Processing of Animal Products, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5219/365
Keywords: chicken meat, propolis extract, oxidation, colour, sensory quality

Abstract

The effect of 0.06% propolis ethanol extract on the sensory quality, colour and oxidative stability of cured cooked ham was evaluated. Half of the experimentally processed hams treated with 0.06% ethanolic extract of propolis with ascorbic acid (EEP), only with ascorbic acid (AA) and control samples (C) were sliced and vacuum packaged. Samples were kept at 4 °C 21 days (sliced) respectively 20, 50 and 100 days (unsliced). The results revealed that all samples were characterized without any significant colour discrepancies. In general, the thiobarbituric acid value (mg malondialdehyde/kg) increased gradually in all samples examined, with a significantly lower (P <0.05) level for treated samples than for controls. The significantly lowest (P <0.05) sensory parameters in comparison to unsliced hams were observed in sliced hams packaged in vacuum. Sliced hams with EEP were characterized with significantly lowest (P <0.05) intensity of characteristic aroma. Undesirable taste was detected in control sliced hams after storage period. Significantly (P <0.05) more desirable taste of sliced hams was observed in those with only ascorbic acid in comparison with EEP. In our study was demonstrated that 0.06% ethanol extract of propolis positive affected oxidation stability and not negative affected others technological (pH, colour) and sensory characteristics of poultry meat product - cured cooked ham.

References

Banskota, A. H., Tezuka, Y., Kadota, S. 2001. Recent progress in pharmacological research o propolis. Phytotherapy Research, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 561-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1029  PMid:11746834

 

Ali F. H., Kassem G. M., Atta-Alla O. A. 2010. Propolis as a natural decontaminant and antioxidant in fresh oriental sausage. Veterinaria Italiana, vol. 46, no. 2, p. 167-172. PMid:20560126

 

Garedew, A., Schmolz, E., Lamprecht, I. 2004. Microbiological and calorimetric investigations on the antimicrobial actions of different propolis extracts: an in vitro approach. Thermochimica Acta, vol. 422, p. 115-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2004.05.037

 

Gonçalves, G. M. S., Srebernich, S. M., Souza, J. A. M. 2011. Stability and sensory assessment of emulsions containing propolis extract and/or tocopheryl acetate. Brazilian Journal o Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 47, p. 585-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502011000300016

 

Grau, A., Guardiola, F., Boatella, M., Barroeta, A., Codony, R. 2000. Measurement of 2-thiobarbituric acid values in dark chicken meat through derivative spectrophotometry: influence of various parameters. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, p. 1155-1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf990518q  PMid:10775365

 

Han, S. K., Yamauchi, K., Park, H. K. 2001. Effect of nitrite and propolis preservative on volatile basic nitrogen changes in meat products. Microbios, vol. 105, no. 411, p. 71-75. PMid:11393750

 

Hunt, M. C., Mancini, R. A. 2002. Guidelines for measuring pork color. In 3rd Annual Pork Quality Improvement Symposium, Michigan State University, 2002, s. 17.

 

Koo, H., Gomes, B. P. F. A., Rosalem, P. L., Ambrosano, G. M. B., Park, Y. K., Cury, J. A. 2000. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and Arnica montana against oral pathogens. Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 45, no. 2, p. 141-148. PMid:10716618

 

Ladikos, D., Lougovois, V. 1990. Lipid oxidation in muscle foods: A review. Food Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 295-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(90)90019-Z

 

Lu, L. C., Chem, Y. W., Chou, C. C. 2005. Antibacterial activity of propolis against Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 102, no. 2, p. 213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.017  PMid:15992620

 

Río, E., Panizo-Morán, M., Prieto, M., Alonso-Calleja, C., Capita, R., 2007. Effect of various chemical decontamination treatments on natural microflora and sensory characteristics of poultry. International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 115, no. 3,  p. 268-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.048  PMid:17320231

 

Ruberto, G., Baratta, M. T. 1999. Antioxidant activity of selected essential oil components in two lipid model systems. Food Chemistry, vol. 69, no 2, p. 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00247-2

 

Shahidi, S., Wanasundara, B. K. 1992. Phenolic antioxidants. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 67-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408399209527581  PMid:1290586

 

Shalmany, S. K., Shivazad, M. 2006. The effect of diet propolis supplementation on ross broiler chicks performance. Journal of Poultry Science, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 84-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.84.88

 

Šulcerová, H., Mihok, M., Jůzl, M., Haščík, P. 2011. Effect of addition of pollen and propolis to feeding mixtures during the production of broiler chickens ross 308 to the colour of thigh and breast muscle and pH determination. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 59, p. 359-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159060359

 

Trusheva, B., Popova, M., Bankova, V., Simova, S., Marcucci, M. C., Miorin, P. L., Da Rocha Pasin, F., Tsvetkova, I. 2006. Bioactive constituents of Brazilian red propolis. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 249-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nel006  PMid:16786055

 

Valle, M. L. 2000. Quantitative determination of antibacterial capacities of propolis. Apiacta, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 152-161. 

 

Walker, P., Crane, E. 1987. Constituents of propolis. Apidologie, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 327-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:19870404

 

Wong, J. W., Hashimoto, K., Shibamoto, T. 1995. Antioxidant activities of rosemary and sage extracts and vitamin E in a model meat system. Journal of  Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 43, p. 2707-2712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00058a029

 

Yang C., Luo, L., Zhang, H., Yang, X., Lv, Y., Song, H. 2010. Common aroma-active components of propolis from 23 regions of China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 7, p. 1268-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3969  PMid:20394010

 

Published
2014-04-29
How to Cite
Kročko, M., Bobko, M., Bučko, O., Čanigová, M., & Ducková, V. (2014). Sensory quality, colour and oxidative stability of cured cooked ham with propolis extract. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 8(1), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.5219/365
Issue
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2014): Potravinarstvo
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)