Evaluation of milk yield in tsigaiewes by somatic cell count

  • Martina Vršková National Agricultural and Food Centre, RIAP Nitra, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky
  • Vladimír Tančin National Agricultural and Food Centre, RIAP Nitra, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Trieda A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra,
  • Katarína Kirchnerová National Agricultural and Food Centre, RIAP Nitra, Hlohovecká 2, 951 41 Lužianky
  • Petr Sláma Mendel University Brno, Zemědelská 1, 613 00 Brno
Keywords: sheep, milk yield, milk composition, SCC

Abstract

The objective of our research was to study daily milk production which was affected by somatic cell count (SCC). The study was performed on a selected flock of purebred Tsigai ewes (326 animals). Regular milk yield recording was performed during the evening milking in around the middle of April, May and June. Milk samples were analyzed for basic milk composition (fat, protein and lactose) and somatic cells count. SCC were evaluated using decadic logarithm (logSCC).According to animals, the dairy ewes were divided into the four groups on the basis of individual SCC (G1 = SCC <100 × 103 cells.mL-1, G2 = SCC between 100 – 300 × 103 cells.mL-1, G3 = SCC between 300 – 600 × 103 cells.mL-1, G4 = SCC >600 × 103 cells.mL-1 to study the frequency of distribution of animals in selected group of ewes throughout experimental period. The average daily milk production in selected flock of Tsigai was 421.02 mL. We reached the highest daily milk production in April 476.40 ml and the highest content of fat and protein in June, while milk production was the lowest. From this flock of purebred Tsigai 76% of eweswere below
SCC 300 × 103 cells.mL-1. This SCC indicated a good health status of experimental ewes, at which 61% sheep were at the first lactation. We found a tendency to lower milk production by a higher SCC. With the increasing SCC decreased lactose content from 4.78% (G1) to 4.32% (G4). Reduced lactose content refers to the occurrence of mastitis and there is a need for performing bacteriological examination in milk.

References

Albenzio, M., Taibi, L., Caroprese, M., De Rosa, G., Muscio, A., Sevia, A. 2003. Immune response, udder health and productive traits of machine milked and suckling ewes, Small Rumin. Res., vol. 48, no. 3, p. 189-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00005-1


Antonič, J., Jackuliaková, L., Uhrinčať, M., Mačuhová, L., Oravcová, M., Tančin, V. 2013. Changes in milk yield and composition after lamb weaning and start of machine milking in dairy ewes. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 93-99, ISSN 1337-9984.[cit. 2014-05-15]. Available at: http://www.cvzv.sk/slju/13_3/2.pdf


Arias, R., Oliete, B., Ramón, M., Arias, C., Gallego, R., Montoro, V., Gonzalo, C. Pérez-Guzmán, M. D. P. 2012. Long-term study of environmental effects on test-day somatic cell count and milk yield in Manchega sheep. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 106, no. 2-3, p. 92-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.03.019


Ariznabarreta, A., Gonzalo, C., San Primitivo, F. 2002. Microbiological quality and somatic cell count of ewe milk with special reference to staphylococci. J. Dairy Sci.,vol. 85, no. 6, p. 1370-1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74203-3


Bergonier, D., De Crémoux, R., Rupp, R., Lagriffoul, G., Berthelot, X. 2003. Mastitis of dairy small ruminants. Veterinary Research, vol. 34, no. 5, p. 689-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003030  PMid:14556701


Berthelot, X., Lagriffoul, G., Concordet, D., Barillet, F., Bergonier., D. 2006. Physiological and pathological thresholds of somatic cell counts in ewe milk. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 62, no. 1-2, p. 27-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.047


Bianchi, L., Bolla, A., Budelli, E., Caroli, A., Casoli, C., Pauselli, M., Duranti, E. 2004. Effect of Udder Health Status and Lactation Phase on the Characteristics of Sardinian Ewe Milk. J. Dairy Sci. vol. 87, no. 8, p. 2401-2408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73362-7


Contreras, A., Sierra, D., Sanchez, A., Corrales, J. C., Marco, J. C., Paape, M. J. Gonzalo, C. 2007. Mastitis in small ruminants. Small Rumin. Res., vol. 68, no. 1-2, p. 145-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.011


Fragkou I. A., Boscos C. M, Fthenakis, G. C. 2014. Diagnosis of clinical or subclinical mastitis in ewes. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 118, no. 1-3, p. 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.12.015


Fthenakis, G. C. 1994. Prevalence and aetiology of subclinical mastitis in ewes of southern Greece. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 293-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(94)90078-7


Lagriffoul, G., Barillet, F., Bergonier, D., Berthelot, X., Jacquin, M. 1999. Relation entre les comptages de cellules somatiques dulait de troupeau et la pr´evalence des mammites subcliniques desbrebis estim´ee avec les comptages de cellules somatiques individuels. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Milking Small Ruminant, vol. 95, Athens, Greece. EAAP Publication, p. 151-156.


Leitner, G., Silanikove, N., Merin, U. 2008. Estimate of milk and curd yield loss of sheep and goats with intrammamary infection and its relation to somatic cell count. Small Ruminant Research, vol. 74, no. 1-3, p. 221-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.02.009


Margetín, M., Čapistrák, A., Valkovský, P., Špánik, J., Foltys, V. 1995. Somatic cells in sheep milk relation to milk production and composition during sucking and milking. Živočišná výroba, vol. 40, no. 6, 1995, p. 257-261.


Margetín, M., Čapistrák, A., Špánik, J., Foltys, V. 1996. Somatic cells in sheep milk relation to milk production and composition during sucking and milking. Živočišná výroba, vol. 41, no. 12, 1996, p. 543-550.


Margetín, M., Hlavatý, Š., Přibyl, J. 1998: Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on milk composition in ewes of Improved Valachin and Tsigai breeds. J. Farm Anim. Sci., vol. XXXI, p. 29-36.


Margetín, M., Milerski, M., Apolen, D., Čapistrák, A., Oravcová, M., Debrecéni, O. 2013a. Relationships between production, quality of milk and udder health status of ewes during machine milking. Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 328-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/14.1.1203


Margetín, M. et al. 2013b. Chov oviec. Chov zvierat v marginálnych oblastiach. 1st ed. Nitra: CVŽV Nitra, 2013. Chapter 3, p. 69-91. ISBN 978-80-89418-26-8


Oravcová, M., Groeneveld, E., Kovač, M., Peškovičová, D., Margetín, M. 2005. Estimation of genetic and environmental parameters of milk production traits in Slovak purebred sheep using test-day model. Small Rumin. Res., vol. 56, no. 1-3, p. 113-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.03.002


Oravcová, M., Margetin, M., Peškovičová, D., Daňo, J., Milerski, M., Hetényi, L., Polák, P. 2007. Factors affecting ewe’s milk fat and protein content and relationships between milk yield and milk components. Czech Journal of Animal Science, vol. 52, no. 7, p. 189-198. [cit. 2014-05-15]. Available at: http://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/00238.pdf


Španik, J., Kačincova, A., Margetin, M., Čapistrak, A., Kališ, M. 1996. Dependence of sheep milk quality on somatic cell counts. Farm Anim. Sci., 29, 111-116.


Vršková, M., Tančin, V., Kirchnerová, K., Sláma, P. 2015. Impact of selected parameters on milk production in Tsigai breed. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Food Sci., vol. 4, (special issue 3), p. 185-187.

 

ZCHOK. 2014. Šľachtiteľský program plemena cigája. (Breeding Programm of Tsigai Breed) [cit. 2014-05-15]. Available at: www.zchok.sk

Published
2015-07-07
How to Cite
Vršková, M., Tančin, V., Kirchnerová, K., & Sláma, P. (2015). Evaluation of milk yield in tsigaiewes by somatic cell count. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 9(1), 206-210. https://doi.org/10.5219/439