Effects of storage on the major constituents of raw milk

  • Peter Zajác Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Jozef Čapla Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Vladimír Vietoris Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
  • Stanislava Zubrická State Veterinary and Food Institute, Veterinary and Food Institute Bratislava, National Reference Laboratory for Milk and Milk Products, Hlohovecká 5, 951 41 Nitra – Lužianky
  • Jozef Čurlej Slovak University of Agriculture, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Department of Hygiene and Food Safety, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra
Keywords: raw milk, milk composition, fat content, protein content

Abstract

Milk testing and quality control should be carried out at all stages of the dairy chain. Milk can be tested for quantity, organoleptic characteristic, compositional characteristic, physical and chemical characteristics, hygienic characteristics, adulteration or drug residues. The content of the major constituents of raw milk is important for milk payment system. Enzymes naturally present in the milk can change the chemical composition of raw milk. Also, enzymes secreted by bacteria or enzymes from somatic cells can degrade the raw milk composition. Products of these degradation reactions can have undesirable effects on milk structure, smell and taste. It is very important that farm-fresh raw milk be cooled immediately to not more than 8 °C in the case of daily collection, or not more than 6 °C if collection is not daily. During transport the cold chain must be maintained. An authorized person, properly trained in the appropriate technique, shall perform sampling of bulk milk in farm. Laboratory samples should be dispatched immediately after sampling to the dairy company and consequently to the testing laboratory. The time for dispatch of the samples to the testing laboratory should be as short as possible, preferably within 24 h. Laboratory samples shall be transported and stored at temperature 1 to 5 °C. Higher temperatures may adversely affect the composition of the laboratory sample and may cause disputes between the farmer, the dairy company and the laboratory. The effect of refrigerated storage at temperature 4 °C during 24 h on the composition of raw milk were investigated in this work, because we wanted to know how the milk composition will be changed and how the laboratory results will be affected. In many cases, the samples are not preserved with chemical preservants like azidiol, bronopol, potassium dichromate or Microtabs. We found, that the composition of raw cows' milk after 24 was changed significantly (p >0.005). We found an average decrease in the fat content of -0.04 g/100g, increase in the protein content of +0.02 g/100g, increase in the lactose content of +0.02 g/100g, increase in the solid-not-fat content of +0.02 g/100g and decrease in the total solid content of -0.02 g/100g. It is necessary to cool the raw cows' milk after the milking to decrease the changes in milk composition caused mainly due to the lipolytic activity of lipase.

References

Bachman, K. C., Wilcox, C. J. 1990. Effect of rapid cooling on bovine milk fat hydrolysis. Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 73, p. 617-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78711-5


Barbano, D. M., Ma, Y., Santos, M. V. 2006. Influence of raw milk quality on fluid milk shelf life. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 89, Suppl. p. E15-E19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72360-8

 

Baur, C., Krewinkel, M., Kranz, B., Von Neubeck, M., Wenning, M., Scherer, S., Stoeckel, M., Hinrichs, J., Stressler, T., Fischer, L. 2015. Quantification of the proteolytic and lipolytic activity of microorganisms isolated from raw milk. International Dairy Journal, vol. 49, p. 23-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2015.04.005

 

Baylund, G. 1995. Processing Handbook. Teknotext AB, ed. Lund, Sweden: Tetra Pak Processing Systems AB.

 

Bezeková, J., Lavová, M., Kročko, M., Čanigová, M. 2012. Selected properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw cow’s milk. Potravinarstvo, vol. 6., no. 1, p. 5-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/177

 

Bogdanovičová, K., Skočková, A., Šťástková, Z., Karpíšková, R. 2014. Occuuence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in bulk tank milk and milk filters. Potravinarstvo, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 102-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/363

 

Celestino, E. L., Iyer, M., Roginski, H. 1996. The effects of refrigerated storage on the quality of raw milk. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology. vol. 51, no. 2, p. 101-126.

 

Chalermsan, N., Vijchulata, P., Chirattanayuth, P., Sintuwanit, S., Surapat, S., Engkagul, A. 2004. Effects of preservatives on raw milk components analysed by infrared spectrophotometry. Natural Science, vol. 38, p. 38-43.

 

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1662/2006 of 6 November 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. OJ L 320, 18.11.2006, p. 1–10

 

Cousin, M. A. 1982. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in milk and dairy products: a review. Journal of Food Protection, vol. 45, p. 172-207.

 

Deeth, H. C. 2006. Lipoprotein lipase and lipolysis in milk. International Dairy Journal, vol. 16, p. 555-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.08.011

 

Fabianová, J., Ducková, V., Čanigová, M., Kročko, M. 2010. Presence of enterococci in cow milk and their antibiotic resistance. Potravinarstvo, vol. 4., no. 2, p. 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/45

 

Fonseca, C. R., Bordin, K., Fernandes, A. M., Rodrigues, C. E. C., Corassin, C. H., Cruz, A. G., Oliveira, C. A. F. 2013. Storage of refrigerated raw goat milk affecting the quality of whole milk powder. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, p. 4716-4724. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6120

 

Forsbäck, L., Lindmark-Mansson, H., Andrén, A., Akerstedt, M, Andrée, L., Svennersten-Sjaunja, K. 2010. Day-to-day variation in milk yield and milk composition at the udder-quarter level. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, p. 3569-3577. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-3015

 

FOSS. 1988. MilkoScan FT 120 Operation manual. Date of Issue: 12 October 1988. FOSS, 69 Slangerupgade, DK 3400 Hillerød, Denmark.

 

Guinot-Thomas, P., Al Ammoury, M., Le Roux, Y., Laurent, F. 1995. Study of proteolysis during storage of raw milk at 4 °C: Effect of plasmin and microbial proteases. International Dairy Journal, vol. 5, p. 685-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-6946(95)00043-3

 

ISO 707 (2008). Milk and milk products – Guidance on sampling. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardisation.

 

ISO 9622 (2013) Milk and liquid milk products – Guidelines for the application of mid-infrared spectrometry, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardisation.

 

ISO/IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardisation.

 

Jay, J. M., Loessner, M. J., Golden, D. A. 2005. Modern Food Microbiology. 7th ed. Springer, New York, NY, USA, 790 p. ISBN 0-387-23180-3.

 

Kaylegian, K. E., Lynch, J. M., Fleming, J. R., Barbano, D. M. 2007. Lipolysis and proteolysis of modified and producer milks used for calibration of mid-infrared milk analyzers. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, p. 602-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71543-6

 

Krebs-Artimová, A., Ducková, V., Kročko, M. 2013. Occurrence of antibiotic resistant enterococci on skin of teats and teat cups of milking machine. Potravinarstvo, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 181-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/310

 

Kroger, M. 1985. Milk sample preservation. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 68, p. 783-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80889-4

 

Lačanin, I., Dušková, M., Kladnická, I, Karpíšková, R. 2015. Occurrence of Enteroccocus spp. Isolated from the milk and milk products. Potravinarstvo, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 258-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/476

 

Larsen, L. B., McSweeney, P. L. H., Hayes, M. G., Andersen, J. B., Ingvartsen, K. L., Kelly, A. L. 2006. Variation in activity and heterogeneity of bovine milk proteases with stage of lactation and somatic cell count. International Dairy Journal, vol. 16, p. 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.01.009

 

Leitner, G., Merin, U., Silanikove, N. 2011. Effects of glandular bacterial infection and stage of lactation on milk clotting parameters: Comparison among cows, goats and sheep. International Dairy Journal, vol. 21, p. 279-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2010.11.013

 

Marino, R., Considine, T., Sevi, A., McSweeney, P. L. H., Kelly, A. L. 2005. Contribution of proteolytic activity associated with somatic cells in milk to cheese ripening. International Dairy Journal, vol. 15, p. 1026-1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.10.006

 

Marth, E. H., Steele, J. L. 2001. Applied dairy microbiology. 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, NY. 747 p. ISBN: 0-8247-0536-X

 

Mottar, J. F. 1989. Effect on the wuality of dairy products. In: mc Kellar R. C., ed. Enzymes of Psychrotrophs in Raw Food. Boca Raton, Fl, USA: CRC Press, p. 227-243.

 

Pukáčová, J., Poľaková, L. Dudriková, E. 2010. Sensitivity to antibiotics in strains of S. Aureus isolated from cow’s milk. Potravinarstvo, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 56-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/21

 

Rakotomalala, R. 2005. "TANAGRA: a free software for research and academic purposes", in Proceedings of EGC'2005, RNTI-E-3, vol. 2, pp.697-702.

 

Relya, R., Weidmann, W., Boor, K. J. 1998. Bacterial tracking in a dairy production system using phenotypic and ribotyping methods. Journal of Food Protection, vol. 61, p. 1336-1340.

 

Santos, M. V., Ma, Y., Barbano, D. M. 2003. Effect of somatic cell count on proteolysis and lipolysis in pasteurized fluid milk during shelf-life storage. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 86, p. 2491-2503. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73843-0

 

Schroeder, D. L., Nielsen, S. S., Hayes, K. D. 2008. The effect of raw milk storage temperature on plasmin activity and plasminogen activation in pasteurized milk. International Dairy Journal, vol. 18, p. 114-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.08.003

 

Vasiľ, M., Elečko, J., Zigo, F., Farkašová, Z. 2012. Occurrence of some pathogenity factors in coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from mastitis milk in dairy cows. Potravinarstvo, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 60-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/186

 

Valík, Ľ., Medveďová, A., Bírošová, L., Liptáková, D., Ondruš, L., Šnelcer, J. 2011. Contribution to the debate on the microbiological quality of raw milk from vending machines. Potravinarstvo, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 38-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/98

 

Verdi, R. J., Barbano, D. M. 1991. Properties of proteases from milk somatic cells and blood leukocytes. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 74, p. 2077-2081. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78379-3

 

Zajác, P. Tomáška, M., Murárová, A., Čapla, J. Čurlej, J. 2012. Quality and safety of raw cows’ milk in Slovakia in 2011. Potravinarstvo, vol. 6, p. 64-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5219/189 

Published
2015-10-16
How to Cite
Zajác, P., Čapla, J., Vietoris, V., Zubrická, S., & Čurlej, J. (2015). Effects of storage on the major constituents of raw milk. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 9(1), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.5219/518

Most read articles by the same author(s)